Article Index

 

Test Results

 

 

LingLong Green-Max Winter Ice I-15

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Perc.

Value

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

3

10%

52,5 m

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

7

10%

5,5 c

Handling on ice

5

8

10%

72,4 c

Handling on ice (subjectively)

5

7

10%

 

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

7

10

5%

53,3 m

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

9

5

5%

5,9 c

Handling on snow

8

6

5%

51,6 c

Handling on snow (subjectively)

8

5

5%

 

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

6

8

5%

40,5 m

Handling on wet

7

6

5%

41,9 c

Handling on wet (subjectively)

6

7

5%

 

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

7

9

5%

33,4 m

Handling on dry (subjectively)

6

8

5%

 

Lateral stability (subjectively)

10

1

5%

 

Internal noise (subjectively)

8

10

5%

 

Fuel consumption (%)

7

9

5%

2,1 %

Overall

6,6

 

100%

 

 

Acceptable controllability on ice and snow

Insufficiently good controllability on asphalt

 

 

Michelin X-ice Xi3

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

4

52,7 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

9

5,6 c

10%

Handling on ice

5

10

74,8 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

5

7

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

7

8

52,9 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

7

10

6,0 c

5%

Handling on snow

7

10

52,8 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

8

5

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

8

3

37,9 m

5%

Handling on wet

9

3

40,9 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

8

2

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

9

6

32,5 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

8

1

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

7

8

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

9

5

1,1 %

5%

Overall

6,9

 

 

100%

 

Good controllability on dry and wet asphalt

Weak side stability and insufficiently good controllability on snow and ice

Weak side stability and insufficiently good controllability on wet asphalt

 

 

Falken Espia EPZ II

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

6

53,4 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

9

5,6 c

10%

Handling on ice

6

6

71,4 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

5

7

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

9

2

51,5 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

8

5

5,9 c

5%

Handling on snow

9

4

51,4 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

8

5

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

8

4

38,0 m

5%

Handling on wet

8

6

41,9 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

7

5

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

6

10

35,0 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

6

8

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

8

4

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

7

8

2,0 %

5%

Overall

6,9

 

 

100%

 

Acceptable controllability on snow

Insufficiently good controllability on ice and dry asphalt

High resistance to swing

 

 

Bridgestone Blizzak WS80

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

7

53,5 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

7

5,5 c

10%

Handling on ice

6

7

71,7 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

6

6

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

9

3

51,6 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

8

5

5,9 c

5%

Handling on snow

8

8

52,1 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

8

5

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

7

6

39,1 m

5%

Handling on wet

7

8

42,1 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

6

7

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

10

1

31,1 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

7

6

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

7

8

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

7

9

2,1 %

5%

Overall

7,0

 

 

100%

 

Acceptable results on ice (though tires can long recover coupling after the beginning of drift)

Short braking distance on dry asphalt

Long braking distance and sluggish reactions to turns of wheel on wet asphalt

High resistance to swing

 

 

Yokohama iceGUARD iG60

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

10

56,5 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

5

5,4 c

10%

Handling on ice

6

5

70,7 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

7

1

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

8

6

52,2 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

9

4

5,8 c

5%

Handling on snow

8

9

52,2 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

8

5

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

8

5

38,6 m

5%

Handling on wet

7

9

42,9 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

6

7

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

8

7

32,8 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

7

6

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

8

4

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

10

3

0,5 %

5%

Overall

7,2

 

 

100%

 

Acceptable controllability on snow and ice

Low resistance to swing

 

 

Hankook Winter i*cept iZ2 W616

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

9

55,3 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

4

5,3 c

10%

Handling on ice

6

3

69,5 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

7

1

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

10

1

50,9 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

10

1

5,7 c

5%

Handling on snow

9

5

51,5 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

8

5

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

6

10

40,8 m

5%

Handling on wet

6

10

43,1 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

6

7

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

8

8

32,9 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

6

8

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

10

1

0,0 %

5%

Overall

7,3

 

 

100%

 

High coupling and good controllability on snow and ice

Low level of noise

Low resistance to swing

Long braking distance and inexact reactions to turns of wheel on wet asphalt

 

 

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

8

53,7 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

2

5,2 c

10%

Handling on ice

6

4

70,1 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

7

1

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

7

9

53,0 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

8

5

5,9 c

5%

Handling on snow

9

3

51,3 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

8

2

37,6 m

5%

Handling on wet

8

4

41,2 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

8

2

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

9

5

31,9 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

8

1

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

7

8

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

10

2

0,3 %

5%

Overall

7,4

 

 

100%

 

Lack of apparent defects

High coupling and good controllability in any conditions

Low level of noise

Low resistance to swing

Insufficiently good road-holding ability

 

 

Pirelli Ice Zero FR

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

2

52,0 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

2

5,2 c

10%

Handling on ice

7

1

65,9 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

7

1

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

9

4

51,8 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

10

1

5,7 c

5%

Handling on snow

9

2

51,1 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

6

9

40,6 m

5%

Handling on wet

8

5

41,5 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

7

5

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

10

3

31,5 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

8

1

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

8

4

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

8

5

1,1 %

5%

Overall

7,6

 

 

100%

 

High coupling and good side stability on ice

Bystry reactions to turns of wheel and predictable behavior on snow

Short braking distance on dry surface

Low resistance to swing

Insufficiently good controllability on wet surface

 

 

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

5

52,8 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

5

5

5,4 c

10%

Handling on ice

5

9

73,5 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

5

7

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

9

5

52,0 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

9

5

5,9 c

5%

Handling on snow

8

7

51,8 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

10

1

35,2 m

5%

Handling on wet

10

1

40,1 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

9

1

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

10

2

31,4 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

8

1

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

9

2

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

9

4

0,9 %

5%

Overall

7,6

 

 

100%

 

High longitudinal coupling on snow and ice

Short braking distance and high side stability on wet asphalt

Exact reactions to turns of wheel on dry asphalt

Low level of noise

Good road-holding ability

Low resistance to swing

Tendency to understeer on ice

 

 

Continental VikingContact 7

Criterion

Points

Pos.

Value

Perc.

Braking on ice (50-0 km / h)

6

1

51,9 m

10%

Acceleration on ice (5-20 km / h)

6

1

5,1 c

10%

Handling on ice

7

2

67,2 c

10%

Handling on ice (subjectively)

7

1

 

10%

Braking on snow (80-0 km / h)

8

7

52,3 m

5%

Acceleration on snow (5-35 km / h)

10

1

5,7 c

5%

Handling on snow

10

1

50,7 c

5%

Handling on snow (subjectively)

10

1

 

5%

Braking  on wet (80-0 km / h)

7

6

39,1 m

5%

Handling on wet

9

2

40,6 c

5%

Handling on wet (subjectively)

8

2

 

5%

Braking  on dry (80-0 km / h)

9

4

31,8 m

5%

Handling on dry (subjectively)

8

1

 

5%

Lateral stability (subjectively)

8

4

 

5%

Internal noise (subjectively)

10

1

 

5%

Fuel consumption (%)

8

7

1,2 %

5%

Overall

7,9

 

 

100%

 

High coupling and good controllability on ice and snow

High side stability and good controllability in emergency situation on wet covering

Low level of noise

Low resistance to swing

Rather long braking distance on wet asphalt

The slowed-down reactions on dry asphalt

 

 


Summer tyre tests


     


Winter tyre tests